Clark v. Osceola Clay & Top Soil Co.
99 So. 2d 869
Opinions
We have thoroughly examined the briefs, appendices and original record. There are numerous procedural errors which, if properly brought to the attention of the trial judge or raised in this court, might justify a reversal. Our consideration of the record, however, convinces us that' in the ultimate result the trial judge ruled correctly. Under the circumstances reflected by this record the procedural errors are either harmless or were waived in the trial court. Therefore, the judgment under assault is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Osceola Clay & Top Soil Co., 99 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1957).
99 So. 2d 869 (Clark v. Osceola Clay & Top Soil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Di Virgilio v. State Road Department
205 So. 2d 317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Marinelli v. Weaver
187 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
In Re Kionka's Estate
121 So. 2d 644 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
Hebbard v. Ziegler
121 So. 2d 644 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)