Clark v. Nixon

Fourth Circuit

Clark v. Nixon

114 F. App'x 582

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 9, 2004·No. No. 04-1802·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clark v. Nixon, No. CA-02-47-2-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2002 & June 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clark v. Nixon, No. CA-02-47-2-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2002 & June 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Clark v. Nixon, 114 F. App'x 582 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

114 F. App'x 582 (Clark v. Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related