Clark v. Nixon

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 9, 2004
• Docket: 04-1802
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1802

MICHAEL CRAIG CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JONATHAN NIXON; JEFF PROCTOR; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; DONALD HOBBS; KENT CHAPPELL; CLIFF HOBBS; PAUL COPELAND; WALLY HOBBS; CHAD MATTHEWS; ALAN CORPREW; SCOTT WAFF,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MARK DAVIS; JOHN V. MATTHEWS; PERQUIMANS COUNTY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-47-2-H-1)

Submitted: October 22, 2004 Decided: December 9, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Craig Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Carpenter Prentiss, HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of 42

U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Clark v. Nixon, No. CA-02-47-2-H-1

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2002 & June 3, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -