Clark v. N.C. D.O.T.
This text of Clark v. N.C. D.O.T. (Clark v. N.C. D.O.T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or to amend the Order, the Full Commission AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Order of Dismissal with Prejudice of the deputy commissioner as follows:
In its motion to dismiss, defendant asserts that plaintiff's claim is based upon an injury that occurred while plaintiff was an inmate on a work crew doing work and that therefore, plaintiff's exclusive remedy is under the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. In his affidavit, plaintiff alleges, in pertinent part, that on August 2, 1996, he and three other inmates "were on assignment to cut down and cut up trees." He further alleges that his injury occurred when he attempted to assist another inmate remove a chain saw from a stump. In doing so, he stood with one foot on each half of the stump. While he was standing on the stump, the stump split, causing him to fall and break a bone in his right hand.
Pursuant to the decision in Richardson v. N.C. Departmentof Correction,
Each side shall pay its own costs.
S/ __________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/ ________________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN
S/ ______________ LAURA K. MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
BSB:md
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clark v. N.C. D.O.T., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-nc-dot-ncworkcompcom-1998.