Clark v. Mulcahy
281 A.2d 823, 161 Conn. 595
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. Mulcahy. Read the opinion of the Court — 162 Conn. 332 →
Opinion
It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled ease have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the appellants’ brief is field on or before November 15, 1971.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Mulcahy, 281 A.2d 823, 161 Conn. 595 (Colo. 1971).
281 A.2d 823 (Clark v. Mulcahy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.