Clark v. Morris Plan Bank
This text of 22 S.E.2d 415 (Clark v. Morris Plan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “A judge of a superior court at the time of sanctioning a petition for certiorari has no authority to approve the required certiorari bond, where it has not been approved or disapproved by the judge or magistrate whose decision or judgment is the subject of complaint.” Clark v. Morris Plan Bank, 194. Ga. 522 (22 S. E. 2d 147).
2. Under the above-quoted ruling, which is controlling in this case, the judge of the superior court had no authority to approve the required certiorari bond which had not been approved or disapproved by the trial judge. No properly approved bond having been filed, the certiorari petition was fatally defective, and the sustaining of the certiorari was error.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 S.E.2d 415, 68 Ga. App. 174, 1942 Ga. App. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-morris-plan-bank-gactapp-1942.