Clark v. Moore
This text of 447 So. 2d 383 (Clark v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Based on the controlling authority of Healey v. State, 389 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), we grant the petition for a writ of prohibition herein and direct that the respondent trial judge grant the petitioner’s motion for discharge filed below. As the respondent, through counsel, concedes, Healey is factually indistinguishable from the instant case and compels the result we reach today. We will withhold issuance of a formal writ of prohibition as we are confident that the respondent will discharge the petitioner upon receipt of this opinion.
Prohibition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 So. 2d 383, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-moore-fladistctapp-1984.