Clark v. Moore

447 So. 2d 383, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12289
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 1984
DocketNo. 84-118
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 447 So. 2d 383 (Clark v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Moore, 447 So. 2d 383, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12289 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the controlling authority of Healey v. State, 389 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), we grant the petition for a writ of prohibition herein and direct that the respondent trial judge grant the petitioner’s motion for discharge filed below. As the respondent, through counsel, concedes, Healey is factually indistinguishable from the instant case and compels the result we reach today. We will withhold issuance of a formal writ of prohibition as we are confident that the respondent will discharge the petitioner upon receipt of this opinion.

Prohibition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barreiro
460 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Thompson v. Wainwright
447 So. 2d 383 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 So. 2d 383, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-moore-fladistctapp-1984.