Clark v. Milens

32 F.2d 1004, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3945
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 1929
DocketNo. 5713
StatusPublished

This text of 32 F.2d 1004 (Clark v. Milens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Milens, 32 F.2d 1004, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3945 (9th Cir. 1929).

Opinion

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a proceeding [1005]*1005for contempt for failure on the part of a bankrupt to obey a turnover order made by the referee. The case was heard on testimony in the court below and no record has been brought here except the opinion of that-court. But the rule is well settled that on appeal recourse cannot be had to an opinion filed by the court below to ascertain the facts, where there is no evidence in the record and where the case was decided on issues of fact. Townsend v. Beatrice Cemetery Ass’n (C. C. A.) 138 F. 381, and cases there cited.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Townsend v. Beatrice Cemetery Ass'n
138 F. 381 (Eighth Circuit, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 F.2d 1004, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-milens-ca9-1929.