Clark v. Mikell

3 S.C. Eq. 168
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1810
StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C. Eq. 168 (Clark v. Mikell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Mikell, 3 S.C. Eq. 168 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1810).

Opinion

°f Appeals delivered its judgment in the above case.

[175]*175.Chancellors James, Thompson, and Desaussuke, affirmed the decree of the Circuit Court: it appearing bo the Court that the intention of the deyisor was apparent, on the face .of the will, to give a fee simple estate in the land to the son.

Chancellor G ajxiabd was of opinion that the decree ■ought to be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 S.C. Eq. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-mikell-ctchansc-1810.