Clark v. Mikell

3 S.C. Eq. 168
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided November 15, 1810·Published

Opinion

°f Appeals delivered its judgment in the above case.

[175]*175.Chancellors James, Thompson, and Desaussuke, affirmed the decree of the Circuit Court: it appearing bo the Court that the intention of the deyisor was apparent, on the face .of the will, to give a fee simple estate in the land to the son.

Chancellor G ajxiabd was of opinion that the decree ■ought to be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Mikell, 3 S.C. Eq. 168 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1810).

3 S.C. Eq. 168 (Clark v. Mikell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.