Clark v. Mickes

Eighth Circuit

Clark v. Mickes

258 F. App'x 916

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 27, 2007

DocketNo. 06-3135

StatusPublished

This text of 258 F. App'x 916 (Clark v. Mickes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Mickes, 258 F. App'x 916 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Hedman Clark appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2007), we agree with the district court that Clark failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees’ motions to strike, and we deny Clark’s pending motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Hedman Clark appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2007), we agree with the district court that Clark failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees’ motions to strike, and we deny Clark’s pending motions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 F. App'x 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-mickes-ca8-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack