Clark v. Mickes

Eighth Circuit

Clark v. Mickes

258 F. App'x 916

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2007·No. No. 06-3135·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Hedman Clark appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2007), we agree with the district court that Clark failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees’ motions to strike, and we deny Clark’s pending motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Hedman Clark appeals the district court’s¹ dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2007), we agree with the district court that Clark failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees’ motions to strike, and we deny Clark’s pending motions.

Clark v. Mickes, 258 F. App'x 916 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

258 F. App'x 916 (Clark v. Mickes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related