Clark v. Metal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clark v. Metal

571 S.W.3d 700

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 2019·No. No. ED 106187·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Metal and Recycling Company, Inc. and Demetrious Hester ("Appellants") appeal from a judgment denying their motion to amend the judgment entered against them and in favor of John Clark following a bench trial. Finding no obvious abuse of discretion, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Metal and Recycling Company, Inc. and Demetrious Hester ("Appellants") appeal from a judgment denying their motion to amend the judgment entered against them and in favor of John Clark following a bench trial. Finding no obvious abuse of discretion, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Clark v. Metal, 571 S.W.3d 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

571 S.W.3d 700 (Clark v. Metal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.