Clark v. Metal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clark v. Metal

571 S.W.3d 700

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 16, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106187

StatusPublished

This text of 571 S.W.3d 700 (Clark v. Metal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Metal, 571 S.W.3d 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Metal and Recycling Company, Inc. and Demetrious Hester ("Appellants") appeal from a judgment denying their motion to amend the judgment entered against them and in favor of John Clark following a bench trial. Finding no obvious abuse of discretion, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis Metal and Recycling Company, Inc. and Demetrious Hester ("Appellants") appeal from a judgment denying their motion to amend the judgment entered against them and in favor of John Clark following a bench trial. Finding no obvious abuse of discretion, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 S.W.3d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-metal-moctapp-2019.