Clark v. Matthews

948 So. 2d 186, 2007 La. LEXIS 372, 2007 WL 628189
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 2, 2007
DocketNo. 2006-CC-2921
StatusPublished

This text of 948 So. 2d 186 (Clark v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Matthews, 948 So. 2d 186, 2007 La. LEXIS 372, 2007 WL 628189 (La. 2007).

Opinion

In re Clark, Jeffrey W.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 566-788; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 06-C-601.

Granted. Although the trial court set the return date more than thirty days from the date of the ruling, the court has authority to extend the deadline under Rule 4-3. Relator’s application, filed within the time limit authorized by the trial court, is timely. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

KIMBALL, J., would deny. TRAYLOR, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnard v. Barnard
675 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
948 So. 2d 186, 2007 La. LEXIS 372, 2007 WL 628189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-matthews-la-2007.