Clark v. Lyon
This text of 2 Hilt. 91 (Clark v. Lyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A defendant, failing to serve his answer within the time allowed for that purpose, upon excusing his neglect and showing a good defence, is usually permitted to interpose it upon such terms as to the court may seem proper, according to the circumstances of the case.
[92]*92As no special reason exists for depriving the defendant of the benefit of this general practice of the court, the order appealed from should be modified so as- to allow him to answer on payment of the costs of the motion to open his default. The judgment, execution, and levy now existing, to stand as security for the payment of any judgment the plaintiff may hereafter recover in this action.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Hilt. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-lyon-nyctcompl-1858.