Clark v. Lude
20 N.Y.S. 985
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. Lude. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 N.Y.S. 271 →
Opinion
In this case the respondent did not appear on the argument or present any points. I think the order of the county judge granting a new trial should be reversed, with costs, and that no opinion is required. See Morss v. Sherrill, 63 Barb. 21; Cheney v. Railroad Co., 16 Hun, 415. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Lude, 20 N.Y.S. 985 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
20 N.Y.S. 985 (Clark v. Lude) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morss v. Sherrill
63 Barb. 21 (New York Supreme Court, 1871)