Clark v. Luce

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Clark v. Luce

104 A. 891, 117 Me. 578, 1918 Me. LEXIS 124

DecidedNovember 27, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A. 891 (Clark v. Luce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Luce, 104 A. 891, 117 Me. 578, 1918 Me. LEXIS 124 (Me. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff in this action of assumpsit sued to recover for money loaned, and for wages for his personal labor on the defendants’ farm. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $152.56, and the case is before the court on defendants’ general motion for a new trial.

' The record discloses much conflict in the testimony, and the jury believed the plaintiff and his witnesses. The questions legally arising in the case were all for the jury, and on examining the evidence we find no reason to interfere with the verdict. Motion overruled. L. B. Waldron, for plaintiff. W. B. Pierce, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff in this action of assumpsit sued to recover for money loaned, and for wages for his personal labor on the defendants’ farm. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $152.56, and the case is before the court on defendants’ general motion for a new trial.

' The record discloses much conflict in the testimony, and the jury believed the plaintiff and his witnesses. The questions legally arising in the case were all for the jury, and on examining the evidence we find no reason to interfere with the verdict. Motion overruled. L. B. Waldron, for plaintiff. W. B. Pierce, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A. 891, 117 Me. 578, 1918 Me. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-luce-me-1918.