Clark v. Lowenberg
This text of 1 Idaho 654 (Clark v. Lowenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion.
The notice of appeal in this case was filed on the twentieth day of October, 1876. It was served on the twenty-fourth day of October. The undertaking was executed on the eighteenth, and filed on the twentieth day of October, 1876. With this state of facts, the question now is, has this court jurisdiction ? Section 438 of the civil practice act of the eighth session laws, relating to appeals, provides that “the appeal is ineffectual for any purpose, unless within five days of the service of the notice of appeal, an undertaking be filed,” etc. In order to constitute an effectual appeal to this court, three things are necessary: First, filing the notice; Second, service of the same; and, Third, filing the undertaking. All of these steps must be taken' within the times limited by statute. If not so taken, there is no appeal effected, and this court has no jurisdiction of the case. The undertaking in this appeal was filed too soon. The statute does not permit the undertaking to be filed until after the service of the notice; and therefore until such service, there is nothing for the undertaking to operate on. It has no office or function to perform. The case stands therefore as if no undertaking had been given, and there was no appeal perfected.
The appeal is dismissed, but without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Idaho 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-lowenberg-idaho-1877.