Clark v. Lowe
71 N.W. 638, 113 Mich. 352, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 783
This text of 71 N.W. 638 (Clark v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clark v. Lowe, 71 N.W. 638, 113 Mich. 352, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 783 (Mich. 1897).
Opinion
(after stating the facts). The defendant contends that the agreement was set forth in the deed, and that this agreement cannot be varied by parol. We think the case is ruled by Bowker v. Johnson, 17 Mich. 42, and Ford v. Savage, 111 Mich. 144.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hagan v. Moch
229 N.W. 629 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1930)
Eckler v. Alden
84 N.W. 141 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 N.W. 638, 113 Mich. 352, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-lowe-mich-1897.