Clark v. Liberty Mining & Smelting Co.
This text of 94 P. 1134 (Clark v. Liberty Mining & Smelting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— May M. Clark brought suit against the Liberty Mining and Smelting Company to recover upon a contract set forth as part of her complaint. From a judgment against her she has appealed. The assignments.of error all attack the findings of fact made by a referee, to whom the case, pursuant to stipulation, was referred for trial and findings. To review these findings we must interpret the contract upon which Mrs. Clark sued.' This contract is remarkable for its insoluble. ambiguity. Its solution is not aided extrinsieally. The ambiguity goes to the extent of rendering the contract unenforceable. Wherefore the complaint, based upon it, does not state a cause of action. It follows that the judgment against the plaintiff must be affirmed.
CAMPBELL, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 P. 1134, 11 Ariz. 322, 1908 Ariz. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-liberty-mining-smelting-co-ariz-1908.