Clark v. Jenkins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Clark v. Jenkins

22 Mass. 280

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1827

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Mass. 280 (Clark v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Jenkins, 22 Mass. 280 (Mass. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think .that as the assignment was not recorded, it is a question for the jury to determine whether the demandant had notice. The deduction made by counsel from the deed of the equity of redemption, is one which might not be made by common minds, but it may be thought by a jury that the demandant is a man of more than ordinary acuteness and so had notice. The action will stand for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think .that as the assignment was not recorded, it is a question for the jury to determine whether the demandant had notice. The deduction made by counsel from the deed of the equity of redemption, is one which might not be made by common minds, but it may be thought by a jury that the demandant is a man of more than ordinary acuteness and so had notice. The action will stand for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Mass. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-jenkins-mass-1827.