Clark v. Jackson
97 S.E. 883, 23 Ga. App. 269, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 75
Opinion
1. Taking into consideration the nature and form of the exceptions to the auditor’s report which were presented hy the defendant in the lower court, in the light of the particular facts of this case there is no merit in the various assignments of error, including that relating to the failure of the trial judge to pass upon certain exceptions denominated exceptions of law.
2. The errors appearing in the judgment as finally entered' up, being obviously typographical, may be corrected by proper amendment. Civil Code (1910), § 5697.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Jackson, 97 S.E. 883, 23 Ga. App. 269, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 75 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
97 S.E. 883 (Clark v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neely v. Mobley
176 S.E. 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)