Clark v. Jackson

97 S.E. 883, 23 Ga. App. 269, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 75
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1919
Docket9879
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 883 (Clark v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Jackson, 97 S.E. 883, 23 Ga. App. 269, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 75 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. Taking into consideration the nature and form of the exceptions to the auditor’s report which were presented hy the defendant in the lower court, in the light of the particular facts of this case there is no merit in the various assignments of error, including that relating to the failure of the trial judge to pass upon certain exceptions denominated exceptions of law.

2. The errors appearing in the judgment as finally entered' up, being obviously typographical, may be corrected by proper amendment. Civil Code (1910), § 5697.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neely v. Mobley
176 S.E. 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 883, 23 Ga. App. 269, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-jackson-gactapp-1919.