Clark v. Holmes
3 Johns. 148
Opinion
It was not necessary to make Hyde a party in the suit. The plaintiff had a right to bring his action against the partner who made the warranty, without joining his copartner. The judgment below must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Holmes, 3 Johns. 148 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
3 Johns. 148 (Clark v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edmondson v. Barrell
8 F. Cas. 322 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1821)
Journey v. Hunt
1 N.J.L. 274 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1794)