Clark v. Holmes

3 Johns. 148
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Johns. 148 (Clark v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Holmes, 3 Johns. 148 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was not necessary to make Hyde a party in the suit. The plaintiff had a right to bring his action against the partner who made the warranty, without joining his copartner. The judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edmondson v. Barrell
8 F. Cas. 322 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1821)
Journey v. Hunt
1 N.J.L. 274 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1794)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-holmes-nysupct-1808.