Clark v. . Henderson

156 S.E. 144, 200 N.C. 86, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 33
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 19, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 156 S.E. 144 (Clark v. . Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. . Henderson, 156 S.E. 144, 200 N.C. 86, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 33 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The only assignment of error set out in the transcript filed in this Court on plaintiffs’ appeal, is based on their exception to the judgment. There is no error in the judgment. It is supported by the verdict.

The contention of plaintiffs that there was error in the instruction of the court to the jury with respect to the first issue, although discussed in the brief filed for plaintiffs in this Court, cannot be considered for the reason that this contention is not presented by an assignment of error made as required by the rules of this Court. See Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 192 N. C., 839. Rule 19, sec. 3.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glace v. Pilot Throwing Co.
80 S.E.2d 759 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.
80 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.
35 S.E.2d 609 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 144, 200 N.C. 86, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-henderson-nc-1930.