Clark v. Harrison

98 So. 3d 783, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18107, 2012 WL 4897857
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 17, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-3991
StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 3d 783 (Clark v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Harrison, 98 So. 3d 783, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18107, 2012 WL 4897857 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Cave v. Rios, 15 So.3d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (stating that the mother’s failure to file a transcript of the trial court proceeding denies any meaningful appellate review and requires an affirmance).

POLEN, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Cave v. Rios
15 So. 3d 760 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 3d 783, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18107, 2012 WL 4897857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-harrison-fladistctapp-2012.