Clark v. Grant

2 Wend. 257
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Sutherland, J.

A party attending a reference is entitled to privilege, the same as when attending a trial; but it lasts only during the hearing and a reasonable time after to enable the party to return to his residence. A party might be indulged in remaining to learn the verdict of a jury, who cannot separate, after a cause is committed, until they pronounce a verdict. It is not so with a report of referees. Referees may separate, and a report may not be made until long after the hearing. The party being engaged in preparing to set aside the report, gives him no claim to be exempted from arrest.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Grant, 2 Wend. 257 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

2 Wend. 257 (Clark v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weston v. Citizens National Bank
64 A.D. 145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Sizer v. Hampton & Branchville Railroad & Lumber Co.
57 A.D. 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Wilson v. Donaldson
3 L.R.A. 266 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
Palmer v. Rowan
21 Neb. 452 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1887)
Greer v. Youngs
17 Ill. App. 106 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Mitchell v. Huron Circuit Judge
53 Mich. 541 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
People ex rel. Watson v. Judge of Superior Court
40 Mich. 729 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)
Shults v. Andrews
54 How. Pr. 380 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)
Salhinger v. Adler
2 Rob. 704 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1864)