Clark v. Graham

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 15, 2005
• Docket: 04-2361
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2361

MICHAEL CRAIG CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEPHANIE C. GRAHAM; RICHARD BOLLARD; PERQUIMANS COUNTY; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-1-2-BO)

Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 15, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Craig Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Everett Thompson, II, Elizabeth City, North Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; David Roy Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his civil complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Clark v. Graham, No. CA-04-1-2-BO

(E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -