Clark v. Gardner
This text of 123 Mass. 358 (Clark v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An adverse claimant is admitted as a party to the suit solely for the purpose of maintaining his right as against the plaintiff to goods, effects or credits in the hands of the supposed trustee, and not for the purpose of trying as against the defendant or the trustee the right to funds to which the plaintiff does not or cannot assert any title. Gen. Sts. e. 142, § 15. St. 1865, c. 43. Boylen v. Young, 6 Allen, 582. Peck v. Stratton, 118 Mass. 406. Evidence that there were no goods, effects or credits of the defendants in the hands of the trustee at the time of the service of the writ upon him would in effect prove the claimant out of court. The decision below admitting such evidence was therefore erroneous, and, as the judgment in favor of the claimant may have been founded upon it, the
Plaintiff’s exceptions must be sustained
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 Mass. 358, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-gardner-mass-1877.