Clark v. Fulgham

New Mexico Supreme Court

Clark v. Fulgham

151 P.2d 56, 48 N.M. 353

New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided August 18, 1944·No. No. 4828.·Published

Opinion

BRICE, Justice.

The appellee brought this replevin action to recover possession of a trailer from appellant.

The only question is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the court’s finding that the appellee was the owner and entitled to the possession of the trailer in question.

We have reviewed the evidence in considering this claim of error and do not find the evidence unsubstantial.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and it is so ordered.

SADLER, C. J., and MABRY,.BICK-LEY, and THREET, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICE, Justice.

The appellee brought this replevin action to recover possession of a trailer from appellant.

The only question is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the court’s finding that the appellee was the owner and entitled to the possession of the trailer in question.

We have reviewed the evidence in considering this claim of error and do not find the evidence unsubstantial.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and it is so ordered.

SADLER, C. J., and MABRY,.BICK-LEY, and THREET, JJ., concur.

Clark v. Fulgham, 151 P.2d 56, 48 N.M. 353 (N.M. 1944).

Pincite

151 P.2d 56 (Clark v. Fulgham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.