Clark v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Florida

Clark v. Floyd

181 So. 2d 345

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 1965

DocketNo. 34461

StatusPublished

This text of 181 So. 2d 345 (Clark v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Floyd, 181 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have before us for our consideration and détermination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in ■decisions.

After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having examined the challenged order, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be ■denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., DREW, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have before us for our consideration and détermination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in ■decisions.

After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having examined the challenged order, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be ■denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., DREW, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 So. 2d 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-floyd-fla-1965.