Clark v. Erie R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clark v. Erie R.

81 N.Y.S. 1120

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 81 N.Y.S. 1120 (Clark v. Erie R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Erie R., 81 N.Y.S. 1120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order appealed from modified, by adding to the second condition therein contained the following: “Also what signals and what rules the defendant was negligent in failing to provide to indicate to its_ employees, operating trains and locomotives entering or passing into the yard described in the complaint, and standing or moving about therein, whether the tracks were clear or obstructed, or to what point or points in said yard they should proceed”— and by striking out from the third condition the words, “as to the location of locomotives, trains, and tracks,” and also by changing the words “five days” to “twenty days,” and inserting, after the words “the order,” the words “as modified by the Appellate Division”; and the order, as so modified, is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order appealed from modified, by adding to the second condition therein contained the following: “Also what signals and what rules the defendant was negligent in failing to provide to indicate to its_ employees, operating trains and locomotives entering or passing into the yard described in the complaint, and standing or moving about therein, whether the tracks were clear or obstructed, or to what point or points in said yard they should proceed”— and by striking out from the third condition the words, “as to the location of locomotives, trains, and tracks,” and also by changing the words “five days” to “twenty days,” and inserting, after the words “the order,” the words “as modified by the Appellate Division”; and the order, as so modified, is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-erie-r-nyappdiv-1903.