Clark v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.
137 F. 1022, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5037
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 F. 816 →
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania·Decided May 31, 1905·No. No. 57·Published
Opinion
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
Before it can be accurately ascertained what legal questions must be decided in this case, it may be necessary to determine the relation' of C. C. Welliver to the transfer of the policy, and tho true nature of his relation is in dispute. For this reason, I think the controversy should go to a trial, where all litigated questions can be raised and settled at one time. I intimate no opinion concerning the legal propositions that were argued upon this motion. The rule for judgment is therefore discharged. See 133 Fed. 816.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 137 F. 1022, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5037 (circtedpa 1905).
137 F. 1022 (Clark v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.
133 F. 816 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1904)