Clark v. Cook

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedFebruary 7, 2023
Docket6, 2023
StatusPublished

This text of Clark v. Cook (Clark v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Cook, (Del. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PHOEBE CLARK,1 § § No. 6, 2023 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File No. CS17-02841 BELLA COOK, § Petition No. 22-24835 § Respondent Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: February 7, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to

the Court that:

(1) On January 6, 2023, the petitioner below-appellant, Phoebe Clark, filed

this appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order, dated December 13, 2022,

denying her motion to rescind a protection from abuse order. The Senior Court Clerk

issued a notice directing Clark to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a

Family Court Commissioner’s order.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). (2) In her response to the notice to show cause, Clark challenges the

issuance of the underlying protection from abuse order that was entered by default

in October 2019. She does not address this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to entertain

an appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.

(3) Under 10 Del. C. § 915(d) and Family Court Civil Rules 53.1(a), a

party’s right to appeal from a Commissioner’s order is to a judge of the Family

Court.2 This Court lacks jurisdiction to lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal

directly from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.3 This appeal must therefore be

dismissed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice

2 10 Del. C. § 915(d)(1), (2) (governing appeals from final and interim orders issued by commissioners); Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 53.1(a) (“An interim or final order of a commissioner may be appealed to a judge of the [Family] Court....”). 3 See, e.g., Wilson v. Div. of Child Support Servs./Ridgeway, 2021 WL 5028375, at *1 (Del. Oct. 28, 2021) (dismissing appeal from Family Court Commissioner’s order for lack of jurisdiction); Wright v. DCSE, 2009 WL 1847743, at *1 (Del. June 29, 2009) (same). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. DCSE
976 A.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clark v. Cook, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-cook-del-2023.