Clark v. Cook
This text of Clark v. Cook (Clark v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
PHOEBE CLARK,1 § § No. 6, 2023 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File No. CS17-02841 BELLA COOK, § Petition No. 22-24835 § Respondent Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: February 7, 2023
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to
the Court that:
(1) On January 6, 2023, the petitioner below-appellant, Phoebe Clark, filed
this appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order, dated December 13, 2022,
denying her motion to rescind a protection from abuse order. The Senior Court Clerk
issued a notice directing Clark to show cause why this appeal should not be
dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a
Family Court Commissioner’s order.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). (2) In her response to the notice to show cause, Clark challenges the
issuance of the underlying protection from abuse order that was entered by default
in October 2019. She does not address this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to entertain
an appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.
(3) Under 10 Del. C. § 915(d) and Family Court Civil Rules 53.1(a), a
party’s right to appeal from a Commissioner’s order is to a judge of the Family
Court.2 This Court lacks jurisdiction to lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal
directly from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.3 This appeal must therefore be
dismissed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),
that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
2 10 Del. C. § 915(d)(1), (2) (governing appeals from final and interim orders issued by commissioners); Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 53.1(a) (“An interim or final order of a commissioner may be appealed to a judge of the [Family] Court....”). 3 See, e.g., Wilson v. Div. of Child Support Servs./Ridgeway, 2021 WL 5028375, at *1 (Del. Oct. 28, 2021) (dismissing appeal from Family Court Commissioner’s order for lack of jurisdiction); Wright v. DCSE, 2009 WL 1847743, at *1 (Del. June 29, 2009) (same). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clark v. Cook, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-cook-del-2023.