Clark v. Conklin
31 Misc. 758
This text of 31 Misc. 758 (Clark v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clark v. Conklin, 31 Misc. 758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
Opinion
As the record does not show that the defendants were residents of the city of‘New York, the jurisdictional facts do not appear, and the judgment must, accordingly, be reversed. Willis v. Parker, 30 Misc. Rep. 750.
Present: Beekman, P. 'J., Giegerioh and O’Gorman, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Willis v. Parker
30 Misc. 750 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 Misc. 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-conklin-nyappterm-1900.