Clark v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Clark v. Commonwealth

481 S.E.2d 495, 24 Va. App. 253, 1997 Va. App. LEXIS 116

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia

DecidedFebruary 25, 1997

DocketRecord No. 2248-94-3

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 481 S.E.2d 495 (Clark v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Commonwealth, 481 S.E.2d 495, 24 Va. App. 253, 1997 Va. App. LEXIS 116 (Va. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon Rehearing En Banc

By opinion dated July 16, 1996, a majority of a panel of this Court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Clark v. [254]*254Commonwealth, 22 Va.App. 673, 472 S.E.2d 663 (1996). Upon motion of Timothy Clark, we granted a rehearing en banc. Upon such rehearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for those reasons set forth in the panel’s majority opinion, and accordingly, the stay of this Court’s July 16, 1996 mandate is lifted.

Judge Benton would reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel’s dissenting opinion. See id. at 678, 472 S.E.2d at 665 (Benton, J., dissenting).

It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the July 16,1996 mandate.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI