Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided April 5, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00781·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

LINDA G. CLARK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:22-cv-781-KCD

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. / ORDER Before the Court is the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand. (Doc. 14.) The Commissioner believes that remand is appropriate to “offer Plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing, further consider the evidence, and issue a new decision.” (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff consents to the relief requested. Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power to enter judgment, reversing and remanding a social security case for rehearing. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-98 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 101- 02 (1991). The Commissioner’s request for remand is appropriate, and given Plaintiff’s consent, it will be granted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. 2. The decision denying benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate all deadlines, deny all pending motions as moot, and close the file. ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on April 5, 20238. ZL Lak o Lo Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security, (M.D. Fla. 2023).

Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security (Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)