Clark v. Cobb
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2157
MICHAEL CRAIG CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TERESA H. COBB; STEPHEN A. COBB, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00179-RBS)
Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 27, 2007
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Craig Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph Courtland DuVall, BREEDEN, SALB, BEASLEY & DUVALL, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action alleging negligence following an
automobile accident. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Clark v. Cobb, No. 2:06-cv-00179-RBS (E.D.
Va. Oct. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Cobb (Clark v. Cobb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.