Clark v. Clayton
61 Cal. 634, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 680
Opinion
In this cause we are of opinion that the action was prematurely brought, and the nonsuit was properly granted.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Clayton, 61 Cal. 634, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 680 (Cal. 1882).
61 Cal. 634 (Clark v. Clayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Satinover v. Dean
202 Cal. App. 3d 1298 (California Court of Appeal, 1988)
Nuclear Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. William C. Cornell Co.
239 Cal. App. 2d 8 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)
Casitas Investment Co. v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.
203 Cal. App. 2d 811 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Marsh Bros. & Gardenier, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
275 P. 886 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Dougal v. Eby
85 P. 102 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)
Howard v. Lindeberg
2 Alaska 301 (D. Alaska, 1904)
Price Baking Powder Co. v. Calumet Baking Powder Co.
82 Mo. App. 19 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.
58 P. 870 (Montana Supreme Court, 1899)
Welch v. Benham
6 Ohio N.P. 33 (Huron County Court of Common Pleas, 1898)
Browne v. Edwards & McCullough Lumber Co.
62 N.W. 1070 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Lambert v. Haskell
22 P. 327 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Cohn v. Lehman
93 Mo. 574 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1887)
Dougherty v. Dore
63 Cal. 170 (California Supreme Court, 1883)