Clark v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clark v. Clark

778 S.W.2d 347, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1067, 1989 WL 82304

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1807 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 25, 1989·No. Nos. 55434, 55511·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/father appeals the trial court’s order modifying a dissolution decree pursuant to a motion by respondent/mother. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/father appeals the trial court’s order modifying a dissolution decree pursuant to a motion by respondent/mother. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Clark v. Clark, 778 S.W.2d 347, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1067, 1989 WL 82304 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

778 S.W.2d 347 (Clark v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.