Clark v. Clark

108 Mass. 522
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 108 Mass. 522 (Clark v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Clark, 108 Mass. 522 (Mass. 1871).

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The case of Brabrook v. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank, 104 Mass. 228, is decisive of this case. The money originally belonged to Betsey Abbott, and was deposited in the bank by her; and though she deposited it in the name of “Betsey Abbott, trustee of Ann Clark,” yet she retained the book of deposit, and gave Ann Clark no notice of what she had done, nor did she know it till after Betsey Abbott’s death. By one of the by-laws of the bank, no one could draw any part of the money without producing the bank book. Even if the plaintiff could prove that she intended to create a trust, she did not do what was necessary to carry the intent into effect. Ann Clark was not a party to the transaction, and never acquired any title to the money; and upon the death of Betsey Abbott it passed to her administrator.

Judgment for the claimant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aronian v. Asadoorian
52 N.E.2d 397 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Wilder v. Howard
4 S.E.2d 199 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Hogarth-Swann v. Steele
2 N.E.2d 446 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Eschen v. Steers
10 F.2d 739 (Eighth Circuit, 1926)
Schauberger v. Tafel
258 S.W. 953 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Jones v. Luplow
13 Ohio App. 428 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1920)
Walso v. Latterner
168 N.W. 353 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1918)
Bradley v. Bentley
82 A. 669 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1912)
Bailey v. New Bedford Institution for Savings
78 N.E. 648 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Cleveland v. Hampden Savings Bank
65 N.E. 27 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Casteel v. Flint
83 N.W. 796 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
Peoples Savings Bank v. Webb
42 A. 874 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1899)
Bath Savings Institution v. Hathorn
32 L.R.A. 377 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1895)
Bancroft v. Russell
31 N.E. 710 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Parkman v. Suffolk Savings Bank
24 N.E. 43 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Hayden v. Hayden
8 N.E. 437 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
Sherman v. New Bedford Five Cents Savings Bank
138 Mass. 581 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Pope v. Burlington Savings Bank
56 Vt. 284 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1883)
Ide v. Pierce
134 Mass. 260 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Northrop v. Hale
73 Me. 66 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 Mass. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-clark-mass-1871.