Clark v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clark v. City of New York

262 A.D. 855, 28 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6257

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 855 (Clark v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. City of New York, 262 A.D. 855, 28 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by a taxpayer to enjoin the City of New York and its officers from interfering with the bus operation of Bee Line, Inc., which has been conducted under a certificate of convenience and necessity, now expired, of the Transit Commission, on the ground that the Transit Commission improperly included in the certificate a limitation upon its duration. The plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice and from the judgment entered thereon. Plaintiff also appeals from so much of an order dated May 12, 1941, as refused an injunction pendente lite. Defendants appeal from so much of the last-mentioned order as granted a stay pending appeal. On appeals by plaintiff, orders and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. In view of the foregoing, the appeal by the defendants from so much of the order dated May 12, 1941, as granted a stay pending appeal is dismissed, without costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by a taxpayer to enjoin the City of New York and its officers from interfering with the bus operation of Bee Line, Inc., which has been conducted under a certificate of convenience and necessity, now expired, of the Transit Commission, on the ground that the Transit Commission improperly included in the certificate a limitation upon its duration. The plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice and from the judgment entered thereon. Plaintiff also appeals from so much of an order dated May 12, 1941, as refused an injunction pendente lite. Defendants appeal from so much of the last-mentioned order as granted a stay pending appeal. On appeals by plaintiff, orders and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. In view of the foregoing, the appeal by the defendants from so much of the order dated May 12, 1941, as granted a stay pending appeal is dismissed, without costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 855, 28 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1941.