Clark v. City of Fairfax

Fourth Circuit

Clark v. City of Fairfax

521 F. App'x 215

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2013·No. No. 13-1416·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric S. Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action challenging his conviction of two traffic violations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. City of Fairfax, No. 1:13-cv00295-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric S. Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action challenging his conviction of two traffic violations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. City of Fairfax, No. 1:13-cv00295-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Clark v. City of Fairfax, 521 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

521 F. App'x 215 (Clark v. City of Fairfax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.