Clark v. City of Elizabeth
42 N.J.L. 259
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. City of Elizabeth. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 N.J.L. 172 →
Opinion
This case raises the same questions of law that were discussed in the cases decided this term, in which the city of Elizabeth was defendant, and the Singer Manufacturing Co. and the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. were severally plaintiffs. •
The points raised for the defence are overruled for the reasons in those cases assigned.
The plaintiff is entitled to judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. City of Elizabeth, 42 N.J.L. 259 (N.J. 1880).
42 N.J.L. 259 (Clark v. City of Elizabeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.