Clark v. City of Binghamton
35 N.Y.S. 1104, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 882
This text of 35 N.Y.S. 1104 (Clark v. City of Binghamton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clark v. City of Binghamton, 35 N.Y.S. 1104, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 882 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the plaintiff’s qualified assent to the paper signed by the other property owners on Front street did not operate as a dedication of the plaintiff’s property that was within the lines of the proposed addition to such street.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 N.Y.S. 1104, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-city-of-binghamton-nysupct-1895.