Clark v. Chicago Railways Co.

192 Ill. App. 358
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 22, 1915·No. Gen. No. 20,361·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. New trial, § 67*—when application for continuance necessary to granting of new trial for newly-discovered evidence. A new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence will he denied where during the progress of the trial defendant learned of the existence of material evidence in another State, but made no application for a continuance, claiming that he did not at any time during the progress of the trial have full information regarding the character of the evidence upon which to base an affidavit for a continuance, the affidavits on the motion for a new trial, however, showing that he had sufficient information, which together with an investigation in progress would, if properly presented, have warranted a continuance. 7. New trial, § 69*—when newly-discovered evidence too remote. In an action for personal injuries, newly-discovered evidence that forty years previously the plaintiff had received an injury which required her to use crutches for a period of seven years, held too remote to warrant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Chicago Railways Co., 192 Ill. App. 358 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

192 Ill. App. 358 (Clark v. Chicago Railways Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawkins v. Richardson
331 N.E.2d 201 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)