Clark v. Chambless

37 S.E. 719, 112 Ga. 461, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 199

• Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
• Decided: December 20, 1900
• Status: Published

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The trial judge did not abuse,his discretion in granting a first new trial, as the verdict was not demanded by law and the evidence on the questions as to whether there had been full payment of the note sued on, and as to whether there was an estoppel by representation: See Freeny v. Hall, 93 Ga. 706.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Fish, J., absent.