Clark v. Carlton

1 N.H. 110
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedNovember 15, 1817
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 N.H. 110 (Clark v. Carlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Carlton, 1 N.H. 110 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1817).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The plaintiff, at the time the horse was taken, had neither possession, nor the right of possession; an action of trespass, therefore, which is founded on possession, is not maintainable on the facts of this case. The plaintiff’s remedy was by an action of trover founded on his property in the horse. 4 D. & E. 489, Ward. vs. Macauly & al. — 8 Johnson 432, Putnam vs. Wyley.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heath v. West
28 N.H. 101 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)
Holman v. Kingsbury
4 N.H. 104 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1827)
Sinclair v. Tarbox
2 N.H. 135 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1819)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.H. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-carlton-nhsuperct-1817.