Clark v. Carlton
This text of 1 N.H. 110 (Clark v. Carlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff, at the time the horse was taken, had neither possession, nor the right of possession; an action of trespass, therefore, which is founded on possession, is not maintainable on the facts of this case. The plaintiff’s remedy was by an action of trover founded on his property in the horse. 4 D. & E. 489, Ward. vs. Macauly & al. — 8 Johnson 432, Putnam vs. Wyley.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.H. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-carlton-nhsuperct-1817.