CLARK v. CALDWELL

District Court, D. New Jersey·Decided January 19, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-16721·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

JOHN CLARK, 1:21-cv-16721 (NLH)

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

v.

EUGENE CALDWELL,

Respondent.

APPEARANCES:

John Clark #42592 Cumberland County Jail 54 West Broad Street Bridgeton, NJ 08302

Petitioner pro se

HILLMAN, District Judge WHEREAS, the Court is in receipt of a letter from Petitioner John Clark wherein he asserts the pending state criminal charges against him are without merit, see ECF No. 9; and WHEREAS, Petitioner asserts the charges are part of a targeted campaign of harassment by police officers and asks the Court to file official misconduct charges against them and appoint a special prosecutor, id. at 18; and WHEREAS, “[i]t is well established that decisions regarding the filing of criminal charges are the prerogative of the executive branch of government, are consigned to the sound discretion of prosecutors, and under the separation of powers doctrine are not subject to judicial fiat.” Gessner v. Dep't of Corr., No. 3:14-CV-111, 2014 WL 972290, at *6 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2014); and WHEREAS, district courts have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 to issue a writ of habeas corpus before a criminal judgment is entered against an individual in state court after certain requirements are met, see Moore v. De Young, 515 F.2d 437, 441-42 (3d Cir. 1975); and WHEREAS, Petitioner may move to amend his petition to include his challenges to his criminal charges if he wants to have the Court review them; and WHEREAS, the Court will proceed with the petition as filed if Petitioner chooses not to file a motion to amend, THEREFORE, IT IS on this 19th day of January, 2022 ORDERED that Petitioner’s requests for the filing of

official misconduct charges against Respondents and to appoint a special prosecutor shall be, and hereby are, denied; and it is further ORDERED that Petitioner may move to amend his petition to include his challenges to his criminal charges if he wants to have the Court review them. The Court will proceed with the petition as filed if Petitioner chooses not to file a motion to amend; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Petitioner by regular mail.

s/ Noel L. Hillman At Camden, New Jersey NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLARK v. CALDWELL, (D.N.J. 2022).

CLARK v. CALDWELL (CLARK v. CALDWELL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related