Clark v. Burning Moscow Co.
This text of 2 Nev. 97 (Clark v. Burning Moscow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[98]*98Opinion by
The only error complained of in this case is that the judgment is for gold coin. It only differs from the case of B. E. Hastings & Co. against the same defendant in this, that the judgment is founded on a trial and finding of facts, and not on the consent of defendant. Upon the authority of B. F. Hastings & Co. v. same defendant, the judgment in this case is modified so as to strike out all that portion thereof which requires the same to be satisfied in gold coin. The Court below is directed to make said modification.
The appellant will recover its costs in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Nev. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-burning-moscow-co-nev-1866.