Clark v. Bullock
This text of 65 Mo. 535 (Clark v. Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill of exceptions, in order to become a part of the record, must be filed “ during the term of the court, at which it is taken and not after,” (W. S. 1043, section 28; Id. 1044, section 31; Fulkerson v. Houts, 55 Mo. 301, and cas. cit.,) unless by consent of parties entered of record, it be filed at a subsequent period and [536]*536within the time thus agreed upon, (Mentzing v. P. R. R. Co., 64 Mo. 25, and cas. cit.) Neither the rule in its statutory-strictness, nor as relaxed by the decisions above noted having been complied with, we can notice nothing which the bill of exceptions, so called, contains. And' as the only error arising on the record proper, will be cured by a remittitur, which the plaintiff desires entered for the excess of recovery on one of the counts of his petition, the judgment of the lower court, modified by the desired entry, will be affirmed; but the plaintiff must pay the costs of this appeal. Miller v. Hardin, 64 Mo. 545.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 Mo. 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-bullock-mo-1877.