Clark v. Brown

Connecticut Superior Court

Clark v. Brown

1 Root 77

DecidedDecember 15, 1777

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 77 (Clark v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. Brown, 1 Root 77 (Colo. Ct. App. 1777).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Superior Court — That there is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of. Eor first, the defendant cannot take advantage of the statute upon a general demurrer, for the plaintiff may have a written note or memorandum of th°e promise, which he might produce in evidence. 2d. This action is not brought on the parol agreement only, but upon an agreement executed on one part; and so is not within the statute. Gilbert Court of Chancery, 231; 1 Bacon Ab. 74, and 75; 2 Str. 783; 1 Blac. Reports, 600.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Superior Court — That there is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of. Eor first, the defendant cannot take advantage of the statute upon a general demurrer, for the plaintiff may have a written note or memorandum of th°e promise, which he might produce in evidence. 2d. This action is not brought on the parol agreement only, but upon an agreement executed on one part; and so is not within the statute. Gilbert Court of Chancery, 231; 1 Bacon Ab. 74, and 75; 2 Str. 783; 1 Blac. Reports, 600.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-brown-connsuperct-1777.