Clark v. . Broadway
This text of 112 S.E. 927 (Clark v. . Broadway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a proceeding by adjacent landowners to settle a dispute as to the true location of the dividing line between their -respective properties. The land claimed by the feme plaintiff is known as a part of the Council Hooten lands, and the land claimed by the defendant is known as the Jesse "W. Broadway land. Both tracts are located in Oontentnea Neck Township, Lenoir County.
J. W. Grainger purchased the Hooten lands in 1891 and conveyed ■same to feme plaintiff in 1900. The same J. W. Grainger purchased the 'Broadway land in 1890, and conveyed this land to defendant’s predecessor in title in the year 1903.
Counsel on both sides have filed interesting and elaborate briefs •, but, .as we view the contentions of the parties, the case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the law 'appertaining to the facts, and -we have found no ruling or action on the part of the learned judge which ■would warrant a reversal or an order for a new trial. The verdict and .judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 S.E. 927, 183 N.C. 680, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-broadway-nc-1922.