Clark v. Board of Education

71 N.W. 177, 112 Mich. 656, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1032
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 11, 1897·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hooker, J.

(after stating the facts). Upon the facts above stated, the order of the learned circuit judge was warranted. While there is not absolute harmony upon the subject, the weight of authority accords with his view of the case. The subject will be found discussed in Edwards v. U. S., 103 U. S. 471; Throop, Pub. Off. § 408 et seg.; 19 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 562r. The case of Edwards v. U. S., supra, arose over a Michigan office, and much that is there said is applicable here.

The order of the circuit court is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Board of Education, 71 N.W. 177, 112 Mich. 656, 1897 Mich. LEXIS 1032 (Mich. 1897).

71 N.W. 177 (Clark v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warner v. Selectmen of Amherst
95 N.E.2d 180 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1939
Tooele County v. De La Mare
59 P.2d 1155 (Utah Supreme Court, 1936)
State ex rel. Royse v. Superior Court
91 P. 4 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)